Engage in the debate of the current issues in financial risk management; particularly the implications of the use of hedging techniques for firm value.

Faculty of Business Environment and Society

Module No         MODULE TITLE            2014-15

M23EFA        Financial Risk Management

FlyAir Airlines     [Contributes 30% to total module mark]

Submission    by 11.55pm on16thMarch 2015 through Module WEB

This assignment must be submitted online via the TURNITIN ICON on the module web

Please note: Engage in the debate of the current issues in financial risk management; particularly the implications of the use of hedging techniques for firm value.
1.     All work submitted after the submission deadline without an approved valid reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero. (This is not the same as a non-submission, as a late submission counts as an attempt and a mark of zero may allow you to resit the coursework.).
2.    Short deferrals (extensions) of up to two calendar weeks can only be given for genuine “force majeure” and medical reasons, not for bad planning of your time. Please note that theft, loss, or failure to keep a back-up file, are not valid reasons. The short deferral must be applied for on or before the submission date. You can apply for a short deferral by submitting an Examination/ Coursework Deferral Application Form. Application Forms along with the supporting evidence should go to the relevant Student Support Office (WM404). For a longer delay in submission a student may apply for a (long) deferral.
The electronic version of your assignment will be used to enable checks to be made using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.

Word LengthMaximum/ Minimum/Range    2000 to 2500 words.

Any penalties for not complying with word limits will be in accordance with University and Faculty policy

Learning Outcomes Assessed

The following learning outcomes are being assessed…

In completing this assignment the students should be able to:

1.    Engage in the debate of the current issues in financial risk management; particularly the implications of the use of hedging techniques for firm value.

An excellent piece of work.

The main theories and arguments have been explained well. Recent research evidence has been used to critically evaluate theories. The student has drawn together well reasoned conclusions. Clear evidence of wide reading.     70 to 100

A good piece of work.

The main arguments for and against hedging have been explained well. Current research evidence has been incorporated into work and student has drawn their own conclusion. Clear evidence of reading around the subject.    50 to 69

A weak piece of work.
The main arguments have been summarised. Some use of current research has been incorporated but work has mainly relied on evidence collated from textbooks. Weak conclusion.    40 to 49

A very weak piece of work
The main theoretical arguments are omitted or poorly explained. Little use has been made of current research and no real evidence of any wider reading around the subject.    0 to 39
Total Mark

Coursework Task

You are the treasury manager of FlyAir Airlines, a low cost long haul airline based in the Far East. Your Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has just presented you with the   newspaper article ‘Fuel Hedges Seen Hurting Airlines’, which he has recently read. .

Fuel hedges seen hurting airlines
INVESTORS from Sydney to Mumbai cheered the plunge in crude-oil prices, sending Asian airline shares to their highest level in three years. The bad news is several carriers could end up losing money from the sudden drop.
Some Asian carriers, like Singapore Airlines Ltd (SIA), have hedged fuel at an average of US$116 (RM402.52) a barrel of jet fuel, when spot market rates are about US$85. That can result in losses on paper as airlines will have to account for their hedges or pay charges to unwind contracts prematurely.
Oil’s dramatic decline in the past month is a replay of events in 2008 and 2009, when Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd, Chinese carriers and SIA all reported millions in losses because of bets on fuel. An inability to take advantage of a drop in their biggest expense also means airlines may be reluctant to cut fuel surcharges and lower ticket prices for consumers.
“It’s like going to the casino,” Mark Clarkson, a Singapore-based business development director at OAG Aviation, said about hedging. Potential losses sometimes could be much bigger than at a casino, he said.
Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude fell 18 per cent last month, the biggest monthly decline since November and December 2008, after the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries maintained its output, opting to force United States shale gas producers to cut supply. Oil prices are hovering around the lowest in five years.
Jet-fuel swaps in Singapore slumped 13 per cent last month, according to data from PVM Oil Associated Ltd, a London-based broker. The price fell 4.6 per cent to US$83.50 a barrel on Saturday, the lowest since August 2010.
Jet fuel is the biggest expense for most Asian airlines, accounting in some cases for as much as 50 per cent of total costs.
Airlines that buy more fuel at spot prices, such as Qantas Airways Ltd and Asiana Airlines Inc, stand to gain more from the drop in oil prices. The price decline is “massive” for the AirAsia group, chief executive officer Tan Sri Tony Fernandes said last month.
SIA hedged 65.3 per cent of its fuel needs in the six months to March at an average price of US$116 a barrel of jet fuel.
“We do have hedges in place. And that’s going to mute the effect of lower fuel prices,” Stephen Barnes, SIA’s chief financial officer, said at an earnings briefing November 7. “On the other hand, it will protect our earnings from the full effects of a bounce if that were to happen.”
Six years ago, when crude prices plunged more than 50 per cent, it pushed Cathay Pacific into its first annual loss in more than a decade.
Its finance director Martin Murray said in August that the airline hedged 44 per cent of projected fuel needs for next year at US$101 a barrel of Brent crude, and 25 per cent of its needs for 2016 and 2017 at US$99 a barrel.
“The benefits are more skewed toward those who have low hedge coverage,” said Timothy Ross, the head of Asia-Pacific transport research at Credit Suisse Group AG.
Qantas has “significant scope” to benefit, said Andrew McGinnes, a company spokesman.
About 70 per cent of the fuel that Qantas will need to use in the six months ending June will be bought close to spot prices, McGinnes said by e-mail. He said the remainder will be priced between current levels and the higher prices seen prior to September.
Asiana, South Korea’s second-biggest carrier, has increasingly bought its fuel at spot prices since 2011 and has this year hedged 8.4 per cent, according to Lee Hyo Min, a spokeswoman. China Eastern Airlines Corp doesn’t hedge, said James Wang, a spokesman for the Shanghai-based carrier. Bloomberg

Cathay Pacific posted its first annual loss in more than a decade when crude prices plunged more than 50 per cent six years ago. Bloomberg pic

New Straight Times 6th December 2014

You have for many years been hedging your exposure to fuel prices and on reading the article the CEO became concerned that such a policy was costing the airline money.


Draft a response to the CEO outlining the arguments for and against your company engaging in hedging its exposure and recommend what the future policy should be.

In your work you must discuss the underlying theory on whether hedging increases corporate value and include evidence from recent academic journal articles.


Eun C. & Resnick B. –     International Financial Management (5th Ed)
Pages 205 to 210

Stephens J             Managing Currency Risk
Pages 33 to 40

Buckley A             Multinational Finance (5th Ed)
Pages 180 to 190

(There is an electronic copy of the last two books available in the library electronic resources)

Journal Articles

Why firms in the UK use interest rate derivatives
Adedeji A, Baker R.
Managerial Finance Volume 28 Number 11 2002

Risk management theory; a comprehensive empirical assessment.
MPRA paper no 4241 November 2007

UK Corporate use of derivatives
Bailly N, Browne D, Hicks E, Skerrat
European Journal of Finance 9 (163-193) (2003)

International evidence on Financial Derivative usage,
Bartram S, Brown G, Fehle F
Financial management Spring 2009


"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon

Order Now